Gwendolyn Taylor commented
2023-08-16 17:23:39 -0400
In the United States, progress is nearly sacred. We tend to place immense cultural importance on growth, expansion, improvement, and optimization- New York City’s monumental and ever-growing skyline is a prime example of this national inclination. Browsing these sources, however, made me wonder who “progress” is really for. Who benefits from urban renewal? Who’s left behind?
Robert Moses’ impact on the city is reminiscent of gentrification, an especially relevant specter in NYC. Gentrification, ostensibly, brings certain amenities to a community- cleaner streets, increased access to public parks, revitalized businesses, and more. However, these benefits come with oftentimes prohibitive expenses. The new Starbucks on the street corner might fill a local need for study space and mediocre coffee, but many locals can’t afford a $7 (!!!) latte, nor the increased rent that comes with the presence of a new, desirable business. As such, residents that may have lived in the gentrifying community for generations prior often find themselves priced out of their homes, unable to enjoy the progress that their neighborhood is experiencing. Robert Moses’ impact on New York is representative of a similar process. Bridges and roads, public parks, and universities are undeniable boons to New York City- they increase both revenue and quality of life for residents. They’re examples of progress and growth! However, not every resident is able to reap the rewards of such amenities. Seneca Village residents didn’t experience Central Park as a valuable center of outdoor recreation, they experienced it as weapon of destruction against their community and culture. To San Juan Hill residents, the Lincoln Center campus wasn’t a place to educate an ambitious young workforce, it was a place which their homes were razed to build. Furthermore, most of them would likely not have been able to afford the ridiculous tuition prices necessary to send their children there. Both of these diverse communities were, ultimately, sacrificed on the alter of progress.
However, amenities like public parks and university campuses are necessary to create a healthy and thriving city. Central Park, for example, gets millions of visitors per year- it’s an undeniable asset to the city! The question then becomes: How can a city implement progress without leaving ANY residents behind? Honestly, I don’t know the answer. I’d be surprised if anyone really does. These sources do, however, highlight a number of methods for striving towards the goal of universal progress. Documentation and remembrance, for example, are key. Excavating the remnants of the Seneca Village community helps the world remember and honor the unique culture that once existed there, and makes it more likely that the city will try to preserve similar cultures in the future. Advocating for currently existing communities, too, is important to ensure that they aren’t razed and then forgotten about. Outreach to city officials can help make sure that they understand the importance of different city neighborhoods, and to try and make sure they preserve them as much as possible. As for other methods- I’m not quite sure yet! Hopefully, Urban Plunge will help me learn more.